Why I’m backing Talarico over Crockett
01 Mar 2026 Reading time: 5 minutes
I’ve already endorsed James Talarico for U.S. Senate. This is the short, explicit “why him, not Jasmine Crockett?”.
1) The GOP wants to face her in the General Election
The Washington Post reports that the Republican machine is boosting Jasmine Crockett ahead of the primary. If the other party’s establishment is spending to shape your nominee, they’re signaling who they think is easier to beat in November.
The Independent previously reported (citing NOTUS and a source familiar with the effort) that Senate Republicans also pushed favorable Crockett polling to help build a “Crockett is surging” narrative, in part to goad/recruit her into the race.
Sources: Washington Post · The Independent
2) Texas needs something to vote for, not just “fight” against energy
Crockett pitches herself as the bigger “fighter”. But Texas is huge, expensive, (still) persuasion-heavy, and (like most areas) craves populism in this moment. What will not work is only being against stuff.
The AP describes a race shattering spending records, and highlights Talarico’s ability to build a statewide operation, including a major fundraising advantage, while also making appeals aimed at disaffected Republicans.
Sources: AP News
3) Follow the money: Crockett is taking corporate PAC + crypto/tech cash
Talarico has sworn off corporate PAC donations in this Senate campaign. The Texas Tribune reports Crockett transferred money from corporate PAC contributions from her House account into her Senate campaign. That means Crockett has taken corporate PAC money for the Senate campaign, unlike Talarico.
🚨 NOTUS also dug into Crockett’s donor mix, including Silicon Valley / crypto donors (like Marc Andreessen and the Winklevoss twins) plus corporate PACs, which is the opposite of the “anti‑corporate” brand she’s running on. Wild.
Sources: Texas Tribune · NOTUS
4) Kicking journalists out and then lying about it is a MAGA move
This is a huge red flag for me: copying the MAGA playbook of treating the press like the enemy.
Semafor reports Crockett’s campaign escalating confrontations with political journalists (including incidents involving an Atlantic reporter and a CNN reporter). In one case, the campaign brushed it off as “silly season” / “no evidence.” Then The Atlantic published audio and a transcript of Crockett’s team telling Atlantic reporter Elaine Godfrey that she had to leave the rally.
I want a nominee who can handle questions in public, tell the truth when challenged, and not import “war on the press” behavior into a Democratic primary.
Sources: Semafor · The Atlantic
5) Israeli Government: “beholden” is not a serious posture
When pressed about Israel, Crockett framed the U.S.–Israel relationship as something we should be beholden to, not something a senator should scrutinize, debate, or condition based on U.S. values and law.
That answer is a bright red flag for me.
And it’s not just the position. Crockett also voted YES on the Israel Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R. 8034), a package that included billions for weapons systems and munitions. If your red line is no more offensive weapons, her record doesn’t match it.
Sources: Bluesky (video clip) · House Clerk (Roll Call 152) · House Appropriations summary of H.R. 8034
Jasmine Crockett claims we must be beholden to our "relationship with Israel". Great question by the interviewer. Horrific, and disqualifying answer by Crockett.
— The Liberty Pear (@thelibertypear.com) 2026-02-28T22:58:14.569Z
6) The “slave mentality” comments and the “picking cotton” line are downright offensive
In a Vanity Fair interview, Crockett suggested that some Hispanic voters have a “slave mentality”. That is offensive and f’ed up. It is also the kind of rhetoric that talks down to people instead of persuading them.
Then there is the church speech where she argued America needs immigrants for farm labor and said we are “done picking cotton.” That is a weird, demeaning way to talk about labor and immigration, and offensive to multiple groups of people.
Extremely offensive, and unacceptable.
Sources: Vanity Fair · ABC 33/40
7) Stock disclosure: this is an ethics problem
The watchdog group FACT filed an ethics complaint asking the Office of Congressional Conduct to investigate whether Crockett violated disclosure rules by failing to fully disclose stock holdings and debts.
If you are running as anti-corruption, you do not get to play games with transparency.
This is a basic trust issue. Extremely unacceptable.
Sources: FACT complaint (PDF) · House Clerk financial disclosure (2021) · House Clerk financial disclosure (2022) · House Clerk amendment (2022)
8) Ethics and character matter
Crockett’s campaign and pro-Crockett groups have run attack ads against Talarico. Talarico has said he is trying to run a positive race and lower the temperature.
He continues to say he respects Crockett and how he considers her a friend - despite increased attacks and lies by her and her campaign.
Sources: Texas Tribune · Texas Tribune (debate)
Bonus: a longer national scene‑setter
If you want a reported deep‑dive on how this primary is being framed nationally, The Atlantic has a long read on the Talarico vs. Crockett matchup.
Sources: The Atlantic
Bottom line: I’m backing Talarico because I think he’s the better general-election nominee and the better messenger for anti-corruption, working-class politics in a state Democrats have to actually win.
